This is a Lens REVIEW of the Canon RF 70-200 f4 IS, against Canon’s RF 70-200 f2.8. I took both of these out to photograph Ice Hockey which is one of the hardest things in my opinion to shoot. If a lens can handle ice hockey, it can handle anything. The question is, should you go with the f4 or the 2.8?
has a silent focus motor built into the lens. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM. Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art. Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. minimum focus distance.
Canon 24-70mm/2.8 L II vs Zeiss 24-70/4 vs Sony 16-50 OSS 18 September 2015. Ultra-Ultrawides compared 26 March 2015 . Canon 300mm Lenses Compared October 2014. Premium 50mm lenses compared September 2014. Canon Ultrawide Lens Sharpness Comparison 16 July 2014 . Canon 10-18mm IS vs. 16-35mm f/2.8 L II 12 June 2014 . Canon 50mm Lenses Compared The f4 has seen off competition from Sigma's 300/2.8 which was way softer, and might still see of the Canon 2.8. It is a lovely light lens with very fast focus, possibly a little quicker than my old 2.8 copy, although later versions may be faster. Both seem to work well with 1.4x teleconverters. . 303 209 423 265 204 342 161 417